Asset owners
Create current aerial documentation of selected components without assuming that every surface or hidden condition is observable.
Capture selected structures and components from useful aerial viewpoints while respecting site control, access, airspace, operating limits, and the asset owner’s safety process.
Infrastructure is a broad category. The target may be a building component, tower, tank, utility feature, retaining area, bridge-related element, drainage structure, shoreline asset, corridor segment, industrial property, or another owner-controlled asset. Each one requires a specific capture question, not a generic inspection label.
We review who controls the property, required permissions, site orientation, operating hazards, traffic, nearby people, airspace, electromagnetic or physical obstructions, stand-off needs, launch and recovery locations, and the requested visible or thermal viewpoints. The asset owner or responsible contractor provides site rules and identifies restricted or hazardous areas.
The service creates aerial documentation for review. It does not replace engineering inspection, nondestructive testing, confined-space work, code evaluation, regulatory compliance, load analysis, or asset certification. Those conclusions remain with the qualified professional responsible for the asset.

Richard Hamilton works directly with asset owners, engineering teams, contractors, and facility managers to define the exact structure, component, and viewing angles needed. The mission is planned around site access, permissions, operating limits, safety rules, and the way your team wants the files organized.
Create current aerial documentation of selected components without assuming that every surface or hidden condition is observable.
Request viewpoints that support a qualified professional’s separate review and field plan.
Document access constraints, visible conditions, work areas, or post-work views within an approved scope.
Build a baseline or recurring record for selected exterior assets and capital planning discussions.
Only the approved site areas, views, sensors, timing, and outputs are included. Suitability is checked before scheduling.
Wide images show asset context, orientation, access, surroundings, and the areas included in the mission.
Closer approved images target the joints, surfaces, attachments, supports, edges, or components identified in the shot list.
Thermal capture can be considered when the asset, operating state, conditions, and intended review support a useful plan.
Recurring routes and view lists can be scoped for assets that need periodic visual records.
Files organized by asset, component, elevation, route segment, or the client’s approved naming structure.
A defined set of orientation images and focused observations for faster professional review.
When scoped, an image index can connect selected files to client-provided plans, labels, or asset IDs.
Project notes can identify the date, covered areas, agreed method, and known visual or operating constraints.
The client must identify who controls the property and secure required access, escort, shutdown, or operating permissions.
Traffic, utilities, equipment, vessels, cranes, workers, RF sources, and restricted areas can change the mission.
If an engineer or specialist will review the imagery, their shot list and component references should be supplied before capture.
No flight is reserved by a form submission. Scope, conditions, quote, and scheduling must be confirmed.
Send the exact address or map pin, site contact, service needed, target date, and any access rules.
We review the site, flight constraints, capture plan, deliverables, timing, and quote before scheduling.
The site contact confirms access, safety requirements, active work zones, and the best window for useful data.
We complete the agreed flight when conditions allow, organize the approved outputs, and send them through the agreed delivery method.
Review local operating context, then use one project form for the exact property.
These answers are visible on the page and match the structured data.
Selected structures and components may be suitable when the owner, exact asset, purpose, permissions, hazards, required viewpoints, and deliverables are clear. Suitability is decided during project review.
No. We provide the agreed aerial documentation. An engineer or other qualified professional performs any engineering analysis, certification, or code conclusion.
Possibly, when the facility provides a site contact, access plan, operating restrictions, hazard information, and a safe flight window. Some conditions may prevent or delay a flight.
Yes when the client provides the asset list or labeling system and the required indexing is included in the scope.
Use the form for the exact location, inspection type, property, timeline, and contact details. Add the asset, expected deliverables, access rules, and the decision your team needs the imagery to support.
Submitting the form starts a review. It does not reserve a flight, confirm site suitability, or promise a result. Commercial pricing is prepared after the scope is reviewed.
One short form routes the project to the Sun State UAS team.
Form not loading? Call (561) 562-4522.